Election fever is predominantly transmitting allover, as election in
Politics is good if it can be used as a science to help the society and other side, it is a most dangerous game when played with the objective of survival only. In my views, in our country politics has already been entered in our veins like blood. At local level, we have ‘Panchayati Raj’ system, where villagers form their own ‘Raj’ for the development of the local public. I have seen the nastiest scenes of dirty politics during elections in which party workers distribute money and wine to attract common people for votes. After getting the power, they have been allotting IRDP status, to the people who are economically very much sound and avail all the facilities being given by the government to the privileged group of people. The government schemes launched frequently for the poor or local people, known to few of them only. Most of the agriculture loans are have taken by the people who are already comes in high economic class. These people are getting agriculture loan at the interest of 6% or so and fixing them in other banks availing interest rate of 10% or so.
Even in educations for school educations politicians have framed different syllabus where private school can have their own syllabus. Don’t you feel this is again to dissect the public in two groups, i.e. poor and rich? The deprived people remain deprived from the feel of these facilities. At national level, we have hundreds of parties. Denudation of parties is a common phenomenon. During elections, Indian politics creates an allegoric comic sequences where no relation can be counted only survival become the final goal. Even finding a good leader from the population of more than a billion people is absolutely a daunting task. Even though, since two decades we are finding collative government after spending 1000 millions rupees during election from the money that belong to the public.
Why I don’t want to vote:
Mostly criminal nature people become more active to participate in election. The people who are really in the business of social service can adopt politics rarely, below one percent of the total leaders come in the category.
Academicians try to be away from the politics.
Most of the leaders remained indulge in the personal politics and least bother about the country in practical.
For one political seat we can find many contenders, even many of them not at all known to public.
Parties publish manifestos before the election and these manifestoes are never being evaluated after completion of their terms.
Suggestions:
An examination would be framed before allowing anybody for combating an election.
Criminal record can be taken seriously as we are considering it an offence while giving any government service to anybody.
Even elections at local level should monitor under the presence of cameras linked to national security systems.
Two party system need to be established.
Portfolio can be decided before the election. Though public may evaluate the strength of any leader with reference to that particular portfolio.
The complete bio-data of every leader should be published, so people can know about the leader whom they are voting for.
The evaluation of any government’s accomplished tasks during their regime with reference to their manifestos need to be done. A special committee should has been appointed for this.
No comments:
Post a Comment